Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEkinci, Ekin
dc.contributor.authorEkinci, Önder
dc.contributor.authorMorkoyunlu, Arzu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T11:26:59Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T11:26:59Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationEkinci, E., Ekinci, Ö., Morkoyunlu, A. COMPARISON OF LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY NETWORKS FOR DAILY AHEAD-FLOW PREDICTIONS ON A RIVER (2024) Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 23 (2), pp. 287-300.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1582-9596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14002/2589
dc.description.abstractPrediction of peak river flows is an important problem for the design, management, and safety of hydraulic structures. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prediction capabilities of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks in predicting daily river flows of the Lüleburgaz stream-flow gauging station (SGS) for the observation period of 1987-2015. The Lüleburgaz SGS is on the Ergene River in the Meriç Ergene Basin in Turkey. Daily measured values of river flow at times seven-days (T-6 to T), two-days (T-1 to T), and one-day (T) were used as input to predict the univariate output of one day ahead flow for an acceptable estimation pattern. The dataset was divided into 75% for the training set and 25% for the test set, and then LSTM, Stacked LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), Convolutional LSTM (Conv-LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) were implemented. The river flow predictions were evaluated by using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), regression accuracy (R2) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). The calculated performance metrics during the test phase showed that, predictions using only one-day of historical data provided the highest performance compared with two-days and seven-days. It is concluded that the river flow predictions would be accurate, especially when using BiLSTM as this was superior to the other models with RMSE of 20.76 m3/s and MAE of 5.33 m3/s. Our comparisons show that LSTM networks can be a viable alternative for estimating future river flows. © 2024 Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Romania. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Romaniaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Engineering and Management Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDeep learningen_US
dc.subjectLong Short-Term Memory networksen_US
dc.subjectpredictionen_US
dc.subjectriver flowen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY NETWORKS FOR DAILY AHEAD-FLOW PREDICTIONS ON A RIVERen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0658-592Xen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Teknoloji Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.institutionauthorEkinci, Ekin
dc.identifier.doi10.30638/eemj.2024.023en_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55293166200en_US
dc.authorscopusid36740928900en_US
dc.authorscopusid56514885700en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194764684en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster