Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemir, Alparslan Serha
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, Talas Fikret
dc.contributor.authorKökçam, Abdullah Hulusi
dc.contributor.authorErden, Caner
dc.contributor.authorDağdeviren, Uğur
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-29T06:55:22Z
dc.date.available2024-07-29T06:55:22Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationDemir, A. S., Kurnaz, T. F., Kökçam, A. H., Erden, C., & Dağdeviren, U. (2024). A comparative analysis of ensemble learning algorithms with hyperparameter optimization for soil liquefaction prediction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 83(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11600-7 ‌en_US
dc.identifier.issn1866-6280
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11600-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14002/2516
dc.description.abstractAccurate prediction of soil liquefaction potential is crucial for evaluating the stability of structures in earthquake regions. This study focuses on predicting soil liquefaction using a dataset that included historical liquefaction cases from the 1999 Turkey and Taiwan earthquakes. The dataset was divided into three subsets: Dataset A (fne-grained), Dataset B (coarse-grained), and Dataset C (all samples). Through the analysis of these subsets, the study aims to assess the performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting soil liquefaction potential. This study applied ensemble machine learning algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, extra trees, bagging classifers, light gradient boosting machine, and random forest, to accurately classify the liquefaction potential of fne-grained and coarse-grained soils. A comparison between the genetic algorithm approach for hyperparameter optimization and traditional methods such as grid search and random search revealed that genetic algorithms outperformed both in terms of average test and train accuracy. Specifcally, the light gradient boosting machine yielded the best predictions of soil liquefaction potential among the algorithms tested. The study demonstrated that Dataset B achieved the highest learning performance with accuracy of 0.92 on both the test and training sets. Furthermore, Dataset A showed a training accuracy of 0.88 and a test accuracy of 0.84, while Dataset C exhibited a training accuracy of 0.87 and a test accuracy of 0.87. Future studies could build on these fndings by evaluating the performance of genetic algorithms on a wider range of machine learning algorithms and datasets, thus advancing our understanding of soil liquefaction prediction and its implications for geotechnical engineering.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSoil liquefactionen_US
dc.subjectSoil typesen_US
dc.subjectHyperparameter optimizationen_US
dc.subjectEnsemble learningen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of ensemble learning algorithms with hyperparameter optimization for soil liquefaction predictionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7311-862Xen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Teknoloji Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.institutionauthorErden, Caner
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12665-024-11600-7en_US
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57219554351en_US
dc.authorscopusid53164163600en_US
dc.authorscopusid55904182900en_US
dc.authorscopusid6508049626en_US
dc.authorscopusid26433329400en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191962384en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster