Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGurevin, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorGulturk, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorPehlivan, Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Trung Thanh
dc.contributor.authorCaliskan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorBoru, Baris
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Mustafa Zahid
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-13T09:13:51Z
dc.date.available2023-12-13T09:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationBilal Gürevin, Furkan Gültürk, Yildiz, M., İhsan Pehli̇van, Trung Thành Nguyễn, Fatih Çalışkan, … Mustafa Zahid Yıldız. (2023). A Novel GUI Design for Comparison of ROS-based Mobile Robot Local Planners. IEEE Access, 11, 125738–125748. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3327705 ‌en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327705
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14002/2176
dc.description.abstractThe studies such as navigating the AMR between stations, docking to the station, and assigning autonomous tasks to other stations are costly in terms of time and energy consumption. This situation creates the need for an interface where the entire work area can be observed and AMRs can be controlled from a single center in the installation of the system in the field. In this study, an interface that can be used in AMR control and monitoring was designed. With this interface; It is thought to prevent costly situations such as determining the stations, calculating the time spent in the transportation of products between stations, determining the movement route. The interface developed in this context was used in an application where ROS-based path planning algorithms were compared. A total of six different stations was identified. With three different local planners: DWA, TEB and Trajectory planner, AMR was given the task of acting autonomously to each station. Thanks to the developed interface, the distance and time required to reach each station were calculated by performing autonomous movement to the desired points. In this way, a comparison of ROS-based path planning algorithms was made. It was calculated that the DWA was 10.55% more successful than the TEB and 2.33% more successful than the Trajectory in terms of distance covered. Additionally, when examined in terms of arrival time, it was calculated that the DWA was 24.64% more successful than the TEB and 2.39% more successful than the Trajectory.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE ACCESSen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutonomous mobile robot; path planning; robot operating systems; GUIen_US
dc.titleA Novel GUI Design for Comparison of ROS-Based Mobile Robot Local Plannersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4035-2759en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2494-487Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9568-7049en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0993-3187en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Teknoloji Fakültesi, Mekatronik Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.institutionauthorGurevin, Bilal
dc.institutionauthorGülturk, Furkan
dc.institutionauthorYıldız, Muhammed
dc.institutionauthorPehlivan, İhsan
dc.institutionauthorÇalişkan, Fatih
dc.institutionauthorBoru, Bariş
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327705en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage125738en_US
dc.identifier.endpage125748en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57208799571en_US
dc.authorscopusid58701892700en_US
dc.authorscopusid57209733164en_US
dc.authorscopusid22951772800en_US
dc.authorscopusid15062434400en_US
dc.authorscopusid57537719300en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001104615800001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177161087en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster