dc.contributor.author | Erin, Kenan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kutlu, Mustafa Cagri | |
dc.contributor.author | Boru, Baris | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-14T20:28:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-14T20:28:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1304-7205 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1304-7191 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2022.00026 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14002/1448 | |
dc.description.abstract | Classification of signals that are received from the human body and control systems is one of the most important subjects of the machine learning application. In this study, classification algorithms were used to classify electromyography and depth sensor data. First, electromyography and joint angle data were obtained from software developed in Python environment. Five different types of movements have been identified for classification and thousand different samples have been collected as training for each of these movements. Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbour algorithms were used for classification. To measure success algorithms, results have been compared for achieving criteria. The results show which of three different algorithms was the most successful on two different sensors. While Random Forest provides the best results for non-contact sensor, K-Nearest Neighbour produces the best results for contact sensors. This paper evaluated the classification success of two different sensors. The results will be utilized in online classification to control a graphical user interface. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Sakarya University Scientific Research Project [2017-5001-059] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported in part by the Sakarya University Scientific Research Project Grant 2017-5001-059. Ethical approval was given by Sakarya University Ethics Committee No:71522473/050.01.04/94. We would like to thank Chris Freeman and Kasim Serbest for their kind opinions. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Yildiz Technical Univ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sigma Journal Of Engineering And Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik Ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Sensor Testing and Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Classification | en_US |
dc.subject | Depth - Sensors | en_US |
dc.subject | EMG - Sensors | en_US |
dc.subject | Human-Computer Interaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Limb Stroke Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of gesture classification methods with contact and non-contact sensors for human-computer interaction | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.department | Belirlencek | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.14744/sigma.2022.00026 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 40 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 219 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 226 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000834787800001 | en_US |